Current Events I
The Vaccination Debate
While it is true that fake news and disinformation
tend to touch upon a number of different topics, very few of them (if not none
of them) bear more importance than human health. One of the most prominent
health-related issues subject to disinformation is vaccination. In fact, the
issue has been so significant that the World Health Organization ranked it
among ten threats to global health in 2019. Additionally, in Slovakia it can be
observed that the public opinions on vaccination have been ambiguous and quite
vocal even though they did not always correspond with the position of health
professionals.
In the recent years, a number of anti-vaccination
initiatives immerged in Slovakia. One of such movements would be for example “Iniciatíva
pre uvedomenie si rizík očkovania”
(transl. Initiative for awareness of vaccination risks). At first sight, the
website of the organization appears to be genuinely credible and veracious. The
website cites different sources and even includes a section called “Svedectvá” (transl. Testimonies) where they provide pieces of
evidence that allegedly prove the existence of serious vaccination
hazards. The problem with these
references is that some of them appear on the list published by Konšpirátori.sk,
which is a “database of websites that provide dubious, deceptive, fraudulent,
conspiratorial, or propaganda content” (Konšpirátori.sk, n.d.). This is also
the case of news medium called “Hlavné Správy”, which is one of the references on
the website of the aforementioned anti-vaccination organization and is one the
most vocal media when it comes to anti-vaccination promotion.
However, regardless of the nature of information that
such initiatives and organizations rely on, the truth of the matter is that anti-vaccination
policies made it as far as the Slovak parliament where a draft law has already
been proposed by members of ĽSNS (The People’s Party - Our Slovakia) (Schlosár,
2018). Although the legislation was not passed by the parliament, this case
shows that there are real political consequences that stem from the way people
are informed about certain topics. In fact, according to Mária Izakovičová
(2019) 48% of Europeans suppose that vaccines cause side effects and as much as
38% of Europeans believe that vaccines actually cause the diseases they are
supposed to protect from.
Although spectrum of opinions on subjects is a natural
and integral part of a democratic society, we need to also take into account
relevance and truthfulness of information in an argument for a constructive
dialogue to take place. This is however not exactly the case when it comes to the
vaccination debate, since most professionals tend to gravitate towards support
of vaccination. This position is on the global scale being defended by the World
Health Organization (2019), and on the Slovak scale the same has been argued by
the Minister of Health, Andrea Kálavská, who criticized the lack of expertise
regarding anti-vaccination proposals in the parliament and called for a more
professional debate (Mičuda, 2019).
The problem of vaccination is a complex issue that
requires professional judgment and it is not the goal of this entry to resolve
this issue, what however is important, is the significance of consequences that
can arise from judgments that are based on false information. Psychologist Gordon Pennycook and his colleagues
found out that repeated exposures to deceptive information increase the
likelihood of acceptance of such information (Horák, 2018). Therefore, even if
we allow for the possibility that vaccination is an ambiguous topic, this case
demonstrates that false information has the potential of making it as far as
being a basis for major political decisions and perhaps we should be extra
careful about that, especially when our health is at stake.
References
Horák, O. (2018, June 28). Ak
sú ľudia opakovane vystavení fake news na Facebooku, po čase ich vnímajú ako
viac pravdivé. Retrieved from
https://dennikn.sk/1164168/ak-su-ludia-opakovane-vystaveni-fake-news-na-facebooku-po-case-ich-vnimaju-ako-viac-pravdive/
Izakovičová,
M. (2019, May 2). Dezinformácie týkajúce sa očkovania patria medzi 10
najväčších hrozieb pre verejné zdravie. Retrieved from https://vedanadosah.cvtisr.sk/dezinfomacie-tykajuce-sa-ockovania-patria-medzi-10-najvacsich-hrozieb-pre-verejne-zdravie
Konšpirátori.sk. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.konspiratori.sk/zoznam-stranok.php
Lenghart,
P. (2019, May 19). Možno je čas sústrediť sa hlavne na to, že ĽSNS ohrozuje
telesné zdravie občanov a špeciálne detí, a nielen ich označovať za
neonacistov. Retrieved from https://dennikn.sk/blog/1461407/mozno-je-cas-sa-sustredit-na-to-ze-lsns-ohrozuje-telesne-zdravie-deti-a-nielen-ich-oznacovat-za-neonacistov/
Mičuda, V. (2019, September 28). Ministerka
zdravotníctva zotrela kotlebovcov faktami a vysvetlila im, ako to je s
očkovaním a kolektívnou imunitou.
Retrieved from https://refresher.cz/69698-Ministerka-zdravotnictva-zotrela-kotlebovcov-faktami-a-vysvetlila-im-ako-to-je-s-ockovanim-a-kolektivnou-imunitou?gdpr-accept=1
Schlosár, R. (2018, November 9). Návrh
zákona – očkovanie musí byť dobrovoľné. Štát nesmie nikoho nútiť nechať si
pichať do tela chémiu. Retrieved
from http://www.naseslovensko.net/ls-nase-slovensko-v-nr-sr/navrh-zakona-ockovanie-musi-byt-dobrovolne-stat-nesmie-nikoho-nutit-nechat-si-pichat-do-tela-chemiu/
World Health Organization. (2019). Ten threats to
global health in 2019. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
Komentáre
Zverejnenie komentára